Select Page
Presidential Candidates: Reduce Government Spending

CORE VALUES

_____________________________

GOVERNMENT SPENDING – NO SAVINGS

• Harris has not outlined any plans for cutting government spending.

• V.P. Harris and President Biden have supported increasing corporate taxes as high as 28% and raise taxes and eliminate tax loopholes on the ultra rich as a way to pay for their new programs

NOTE:

Both candidates total spending proposals will drive up the National Debt. Harris by 2 trillion  Trump by 5.8 trillion according to a Penn Wharton forecast

*Penn Wharton Budget Model, a group within the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School that analyzes the budgetary impact of government policies.

_____________________________

Harris plans would add $1.7 trillion to national debt

4.4% above its current trajectory by 2034

SOURCE: Penn Wharton Budget Model

https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/

_____________________________

_____________________________

HARRIS PLAN VS TRUMP: “Spending Cuts”

Former President Donald Trump would seek to extend the tax cuts enacted through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, his signature 2017 legislation that reduced taxes for most Americans, although research has shown the top earners received the biggest benefits. He’s also proposing to eliminate taxes on tips and on Social Security income, while also lowering the corporate tax rate.

Vice President Harris has proposed introducing more generous tax benefits for families, as well as hiking the corporate tax rate to help offset spending from bigger tax credits. 

The two proposals reflect different views of how best to support U.S. families and fuel economic growth. On the one hand, Trump’s plan would provide tax cuts for all income groups, but the biggest winners would be higher-income Americans. The greatest benefits under Harris’ plan would go to the lowest-income Americans, while she would up the taxes of the top-earning households. 

Ultimately, both plans would come with significant price tags, although the combination of Trump’s tax cuts for corporations and individuals would prove more expensive, Penn Wharton forecast. It estimates that his proposal would add $5.8 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade, compared with $2 trillion for Harris’ plan. 

HARRIS PLAN WOULD COST 1.7 TRILLION

_____________________________

NOTE: INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS WEBSITE COMES EXCLUSIVELY  FROM THE POLITICIANS THEMSELVES,  BUT MAY INCLUDES CLAIMS FROM THE CANDIDATES THAT ARE NOT COMPLETELY ACCURATE.

_____________________________

2024 DEMOCRATIC PLATFORM  POSITION: Reduce Government Spending

_____________________________

NO PLANS PROPOSED TO REDUCE SPENDING

_____________________________

SOURCE: CBS News

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kamala-harris-donald-trump-tax-plan-impact-on-your-paycheck/

SOURCE: Democratic Platform – On their official website

COMBATING THE CLIMATE CRISIS AND PURSUING ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE

CORE VALUES

_____________________________

REIN IN SPENDINGS

Stabilize the Economy by slashing wasteful Government spending

POSSIBLE SCHOOL FUNDING CUTS

Cut Federal funding for any school pushing critical race theory, gender ideology, racial, sexual or political content

Close the Department of Education in Washington, D.C. and send it back to the States

_____________________________

Trump plans would add $5.8 trillion to national debt

9.3% above its current trajectory by 2034

NOTE:

Both candidates total spending proposals will drive up the National Debt. Harris by 1.7 trillion  Trump by 5.8 trillion according to a Penn Wharton forecast*

*Penn Wharton Budget Model, a group within the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School that analyzes the budgetary impact of government policies.

_____________________________

TRUMP PLAN VS HARRIS: “Spending Cuts”

Former President Donald Trump would seek to extend the tax cuts enacted through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, his signature 2017 legislation that reduced taxes for most Americans, although research has shown the top earners received the biggest benefits. He’s also proposing to eliminate taxes on tips and on Social Security income, while also lowering the corporate tax rate.

Vice President Harris has proposed introducing more generous tax benefits for families, as well as hiking the corporate tax rate to help offset spending from bigger tax credits. 

The two proposals reflect different views of how best to support U.S. families and fuel economic growth. On the one hand, Trump’s plan would provide tax cuts for all income groups, but the biggest winners would be higher-income Americans. The greatest benefits under Harris’ plan would go to the lowest-income Americans, while she would up the taxes of the top-earning households. 

Ultimately, both plans would come with significant price tags, although the combination of Trump’s tax cuts for corporations and individuals would prove more expensive, Penn Wharton forecast. It estimates that his proposal would add $5.8 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade, compared with $2 trillion for Harris’ plan. 

TRUMP PLAN WOULD COST 5.8 TRILLION

_____________________________

2024 GOP PLATFORM POSITION: Government Spending

_____________________________

REIN IN WASTEFUL GOVERNMENT SPENDING

CUT FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ANY SCHOOL PUSHING CRITICAL RACE THEORY, RADICAL GENDER IDEOLOGY, AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE RACIAL, SEXUAL, OR POLITICAL CONTENT ON OUR CHILDREN

_____________________________

HOW THE REPUBLICANS WILL DO IT.

NOTE: INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS WEBSITE COMES EXCLUSIVELY  FROM THE DONALD TRUMP WEBSITE WHICH MAY INCLUDES CLAIMS FROM THE CANDIDATE THAT ARE NOT COMPLETELY ACCURATE.

Rein in Wasteful Federal Spending

Republicans will immediately stabilize the Economy by slashing wasteful Government spending and promoting Economic Growth.

Return Education to the States

The United States spends more money per pupil on Education than any other Country in the World, and yet we are at the bottom of every educational list in terms of results. We are going to close the Department of Education in Washington, D.C. and send it back to the States, where it belongs, and let the States run our educational system as it should be run.

NOTE: Closing the Federal Department of Education with reduce federal costs, but running schools will be passed on to states and mot likely a rise in state

_____________________________

SOURCE: CBS News

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kamala-harris-donald-trump-tax-plan-impact-on-your-paycheck/

SOURCE: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/2024-republican-party-platform

SOURCE: Penn Wharton Budget Model

https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/